Many people begin researching facelifts after seeing dramatic transformations online. One of the terms that often appears is “deep plane facelift.” This technique has become popular because of celebrity conversations and social media discussions. Another widely used approach is the SMAS-tightening facelift, which focuses on lifting and securing the support layer beneath the skin.

Both techniques aim to restore facial definition. They simply approach the anatomy in different ways. Dr. Sanders believes that understanding these differences helps patients make confident decisions with a full picture of the benefits and the potential drawbacks.

What Is a Deep Plane Facelift

A deep plane facelift lifts the deeper layers of the face as a single unit. This includes tissue under the SMAS layer. The goal is to release tension points and reposition the midface with less pulling on the skin.

Pros

• Can reposition deeper structures, which may create noticeable lift.
• Addresses heaviness in the midface with one unified movement.
• Can soften deep folds around the nose and mouth.

Cons

• Involves deeper dissection that may increase risks such as nerve irritation.
• Can require longer recovery.
• Adds complexity that may not be necessary for every patient.
• Not always the best option for people who want subtle, natural looking results.

Dr. Sanders believes that less risky facelift options can be just as fruitful without the added depth of dissection required in the deep plane approach.

What Is a SMAS-Tightening Facelift

A SMAS-tightening facelift focuses on lifting the support layer that sits just under the skin. This method avoids the deeper tissue layers and creates a refreshed, natural contour without excessive tension.

Pros

• Preserves soft facial expression, so patients look refreshed rather than altered.
• Gives the surgeon precise control, which helps avoid the “overdone” appearance that can come from deeper dissection.
• Often results in a shorter and more comfortable recovery.
• Reduces risk to delicate facial nerves because the technique stays in a safer and more predictable tissue plane.
• Suitable for a wide range of ages and facial types, which makes it a dependable option for patients who want noticeable improvement without added risk.

Cons

• May not address significant midface heaviness in a single procedure.
• May require complementary procedures such as fat grafting or a deep buccal release in select patients to fully restore midface volume.
• Results depend on surgeon technique and eye for balance.

Dr. Sanders often favors this method because it provides consistent and natural looking outcomes while maintaining a strong safety profile.

Which Technique Is Right for You

Most patients want natural definition that helps them look like themselves. They want to avoid anything that feels overly dramatic. For many people this makes a SMAS-tightening facelift a suitable choice.

A deep plane facelift may be appropriate for select patients with specific concerns. However, the risks can outweigh the benefits for some individuals.

The best approach begins with a conversation about your goals, your anatomy, and your comfort level with recovery and risk.

Why Dr. Sanders Uses a Safety Focused Approach

Dr. Sanders has decades of experience in facial rejuvenation, and his approach centers on helping patients understand the full range of their options. Each face ages in its own way, and the right technique depends on your anatomy and the type of improvement you want to see. He guides patients through the benefits and the limitations of each approach so they feel confident and informed before moving forward. To explore which facelift method may be right for you, schedule a consultation with Dr. Sanders.